by clicking on the page. A slider will appear, allowing you to adjust your zoom level. Return to the original size by clicking on the page again.
the page around when zoomed in by dragging it.
the zoom using the slider on the top right.
by clicking on the zoomed-in page.
by entering text in the search field and click on "In This Issue" or "All Issues" to search the current issue or the archive of back issues respectively.
by clicking on thumbnails to select pages, and then press the print button.
this publication and page.
displays a table of sections with thumbnails and descriptions.
displays thumbnails of every page in the issue. Click on a page to jump.
allows you to browse through every available issue.
FCW : August 15, 2016
Adam Levithan is director of product management at Metalogix. Commentary | ADAM LEVITHAN “Migration” and “modernization” are hot topics in government today. Whether it’s a discussion about the proposed $3.1 billion IT Moderniza- tion Fund, the need to align with the cloud-first policy or an expand- ing realization that legacy IT just doesn’t cut it, more and more agen- cies are carefully studying the ins and outs of migrating to modern platforms. And although modernized infra- structure leads to a more produc- tive and efficient government, migrations can be time-consuming and risky endeavors that require an abundance of forethought to safely navigate. Every turn brings the possibility of an unseen complica- tion or setback that could push projects past deadlines and over budget. By now, agencies have devel- oped a fairly solid understanding of the technical factors that can cause a migration meltdown, and a number of solutions can help in that regard. There is a factor to migrations, however, that often goes overlooked but is absolutely critical: the human element. When undertaking a major migration effort, federal IT man- agers face pressures from every angle. The technology itself is under scrutiny from agency CIOs. The financial aspects are similarly parsed — not just over raw dol- lar amounts, but also opportunity costs. There are the ubiquitous security concerns — how can the agency migrate without putting data at risk of loss or compromise? And how will the new system be hardened and secured once the migration is finalized? Those are all very visible driving concerns for a migration. Less con- sidered, but no less important, is how end-user buy-in will ultimately affect the staying power of a migra- tion. After all, we are all end users, anditisuptouswhetheranew technology is successfully adopted or left neglected and unused. To ensure that their migration effort does not wind up in the lat- ter category, agency IT managers must factor end users into migra- tion plans from the beginning. Thankfully, that is not hard to do because the first step of securing end-user buy-in should also be one of the first steps in developing a migration plan: analyzing mission impact. To fully understand how a planned migration will affect daily operations, agencies should engage end users by asking questions about what content they are using, how often and for what purposes, in addition to asking about any special considerations that might come into play such as classifica- tion levels and compliance controls. Those questions are vital to understanding how any planned or unplanned downtime during the migration will affect agency continuity. The feedback also provides the foundation for a comprehensive map of how employees are cur- rently using agency systems. End users are never a monolithic block, and agencies need to understand how their usage patterns overlap and diverge. In any migration, there will be a contingency of end users who eagerly await change, a chunk who are averse to change for any reason and a wide swath who fall somewhere in the middle. The challenge in constructing a successful plan hinges on building in the flexibility needed to cover every user. Otherwise, agencies will be stuck with either too nar- row a plan that applies to only a select minority or too broad a plan that blankets the entire agency under a one-size-fits-all approach. Neither extreme tends to be successful. By following these steps, agen- cies will have all the fundamentals they need to humanize the migra- tion. It all starts with gaining vis- ibility over the hidden factor of a migration — people. n End users can make or break an agency migration IT modernization is a risky endeavor made even riskier because agencies too often overlook the human factor The challenge in constructing a successful plan hinges on building in the flexibility needed to cover every user. August 15, 2016 FCW.COM 13 0815fcw_013.indd 13 7/22/16 9:17 AM
July 30, 2016
August 30, 2016