by clicking on the page. A slider will appear, allowing you to adjust your zoom level. Return to the original size by clicking on the page again.
the page around when zoomed in by dragging it.
the zoom using the slider on the top right.
by clicking on the zoomed-in page.
by entering text in the search field and click on "In This Issue" or "All Issues" to search the current issue or the archive of back issues respectively.
by clicking on thumbnails to select pages, and then press the print button.
this publication and page.
displays a table of sections with thumbnails and descriptions.
displays thumbnails of every page in the issue. Click on a page to jump.
allows you to browse through every available issue.
FCW : August 30, 2013
Bills have been introduced in both the Senate and the House in recent weeks that would establish a Gov- ernment Transformation Commis- sion. The bills purpose is to assess, transform and demonstrate results in the ef ciency, effectiveness and economy of government programs. If the legislation is enacted, the commission would be the rst enti- ty created expressly to ensure that our government s programs save money and are operated effectively. Government programs have not been assessed at this level of detail so that meaningful and measur- able action could be taken. At this dif cult time of budget de cits, major cuts are being made and Congress is facing tough decisions with regard to social insurance, tax reform and civil service reform, among others. The operation and management of agency programs must also be addressed to cap- ture ef ciency and savings, and to strengthen the government s service to the American people. Agency leaders would be well served by such a commission. In the current political environment --- with its short election cycles and the need to address major domestic and world issues --- it is dif cult for agency leaders to maintain their focus on ef ciency, effectiveness and economy. With Congress frozen by politics and turnover at all levels, lawmakers are largely unable to keep up with government programs and determine if they are effective, ef cient, duplicative or outdated. Such oversight is a necessary part of savings and de cit reduction. The status quo will no longer do. Given the size of the federal govern- ment, attention to program ef cien- cy could result in billions of dollars in savings. The commission, therefore, would become a valuable tool that supports government leaders and provides the resources agencies need to do their work. For the rst time, agency leaders would be able to: • Have their programs assessed and implement changes without direct cost to the agencies. • Have employees participate in the effort through reimbursed detail assignments to the commission, where they would collaborate with experts and develop skills they can take back to their agencies. • Share in cost savings by allowing funds to be applied where they are critically needed. • Have a Web portal through which agency employees and others can become part of the solution by offering suggestions for improve- ment and change. By supporting the hardworking employees, managers and leaders who keep the trains running every day, the commission would provide the perfect opportunity to get the job done. With a dedicated entity responsible for results and account- able to the president and Congress, transparency would be assured. The Hoover Commission did a great job of addressing government ef ciency in the 1940s, and the National Performance Review start- ed the dialogue again in the 1990s. It s now time for a statutory tool to nish the work. Under the pro- posed legislation, the commission would have the authority to assess and make needed changes, in col- laboration with agency leaders. It would have the power to conduct hearings, take testimony, and gather necessary data and information. It would be required to report on its progress every six months and on its results every year. Recommendations requiring legislative action would be subject to a time-limited up-or-down vote. Others would go to the president, and the commission would work collaboratively with agency leaders. There is no better time to enact this legislation. Our government must become more ef cient so that across-the-board budget cuts are not necessary, the American people are best served, their money is used wisely, and federal jobs are not lost or employees furloughed. ■ Why a transformation commission is good for feds Legislation before Congress could provide vital support for agencies that are struggling to save money while serving the public Given the size of the federal government, attention to program efficiency could result in billions of dollars in savings. Commentary | STEVE GOODRICH STEVE GOODRICH is president of the Center for Organizational Excellence and a Government Transformation Initiative board member. August 30, 2013 FCW.COM 11
August 15, 2013
September 15, 2013