by clicking on the page. A slider will appear, allowing you to adjust your zoom level. Return to the original size by clicking on the page again.
the page around when zoomed in by dragging it.
the zoom using the slider on the top right.
by clicking on the zoomed-in page.
by entering text in the search field and click on "In This Issue" or "All Issues" to search the current issue or the archive of back issues respectively.
by clicking on thumbnails to select pages, and then press the print button.
this publication and page.
displays a table of sections with thumbnails and descriptions.
displays thumbnails of every page in the issue. Click on a page to jump.
allows you to browse through every available issue.
FCW : November 15, 2013
Commentary | ANDREW ROBINSON In today s austere budgetary envi- ronment, does anyone have the time or resources to invest in the latest trends recommended by man- agement thought leaders? If you are like me, it s hard to muster enthusi- asm for yet another "big idea," but doing nothing is hardly a recipe for success either. Thankfully, there is another way for the federal IT community to innovate --- it just requires a differ- ent perspective. Instead of coming up with a new program or blue-sky vision for the future, let s rst look back. Con- sider what we have accomplished, move it to the forefront, and then determine what is good, worthy or in need of improvement. We will need to de ne programmatic mis- sions, functional requirements and stakeholders, then factor in recent technology advancements (cloud, mobile, social, etc.) and partner with program stakeholders to "innovate." That s it. My apologies to the management consulting industry, but that s really all there is to inno- vation. Of course, "simple" does not equal "easy." There is plenty of work to do. That work is worth the effort, though, if we keep two important principles in mind. 1. The approach to innovation should capitalize on what came before by rede ning and giv- ing it new meaning. For example, it s not that enterprise architecture was a bad idea. On the contrary, EA is integral to well-managed IT infrastructure and governance. But rather than making it the construct by which departments are struc- tured and their processes de ned and managed, with or without busi- ness buy-in, it seems to me that EA needs to be rede ned. Frankly, we need to do a lot of rede ning. Given all the poli- cies, memoranda, structures and methodologies that have been developed, I question how a federal CIO organization could even make sense of it all let alone establish governance and be con dent of compliance. But don t throw out the 25-point plan for reforming federal IT and start over. Today s innova- tors must retool, not reinvent. 2. Innovation should not focus solely on IT but rather on the intersection of IT and business. Too many in this community think that IT is in itself innovative --- a belief that I nd a bit self-centered. And truth be told, innovation has its roots in the business side of the house. It grew out of the "design thinking" community. In case you missed that one, it detailed the cor- porate creative process and how to foster it, and morphed into a larger concept that speaks to enterprise strategy and competiveness. The book "Making Innovation Work" by Tony Davila, Marc Epstein and Robert Shelton speaks well to how an organization should man- age and measure the three phases of innovation: generation, conver- sion and integration. It s easy to imagine where problems might lie for government. We have plenty of smart people who are fully capable of generating good ideas, yet con- verting those ideas into practical innovations that can be integrated into the government environment is remarkably dif cult --- far more challenging than in the commercial sector. But again, the alternative of not innovating is no alternative at all. And in today s challenging budget environment, good ideas that pro- mote ef ciency or effectiveness will be well received by business lead- ers. Let s not wait on grand reforms that might or might not get imple- mented in our lifetime. As chair of ACT-IAC s Institute for Innovation, I would like to explore where government has successfully innovated and hear whatever advice innovation leaders in government would like to share with the rest of us. Let s work together in the com- ing months to avoid chasing the latest trends and embrace a better brand of innovation. ■ Want real innovation? Don't start from scratch! The last thing federal IT needs is another 25-point plan. What is really required is some rede ning. It's hard to muster enthusiasm for yet another "big idea," but doing nothing is hardly a recipe for success either. ANDREW ROBINSON is senior vice president of ICF International. 10 November 15, 2013 FCW.COM
October 30, 2013
November 30, 2013