by clicking on the page. A slider will appear, allowing you to adjust your zoom level. Return to the original size by clicking on the page again.
the page around when zoomed in by dragging it.
the zoom using the slider on the top right.
by clicking on the zoomed-in page.
by entering text in the search field and click on "In This Issue" or "All Issues" to search the current issue or the archive of back issues respectively.
by clicking on thumbnails to select pages, and then press the print button.
this publication and page.
displays a table of sections with thumbnails and descriptions.
displays thumbnails of every page in the issue. Click on a page to jump.
allows you to browse through every available issue.
FCW : June 30, 2014
In "Innovation the NASA Way, " author Rod Pyle uses 17 case studies to illustrate the culture and systems that have driven the agency s accomplishments in the past six decades. FCW sTroy K. Schneider spoke with Pyle about the larger lessons in such a unique agency mission. Every time we write about NASA, people say, "That s ne, but it s not fair. They have rockets and astronauts. How can my agency compete with that?" If you spend time at NASA eld cen- ters, like anywhere else in govern- ment, you see a lot being done with very little. It s not like they re getting B-17s worth of money dropped on them. They re using what will do the job and very little more. And yeah, they have rocket sci- entists. There are a lot of very smart people there, but that doesn t mean the resources are any better than they are anywhere else. One thing you will nd at all the eld centers is the encouragement to think blue sky. Now back in the Apollo days, when we were grinding up 5 percent of the budget on NASA, you could think blue sky and then do blue sky. But at half of 1 percent, they think blue sky and then have to pack it in a small budget box. But they re still encouraged to do that, and that s where things like Sky Crane with the Curiosity Mars rover come from. That team was tasked with getting this mammoth heavy thing to the surface of another planet, and that s really hard to do. They came up with this wacky solu- tion --- the chief engineer said the hardest part was passing the laugh test when he went to see the director. But it was the only way they could gure out to make it work, and it did work --- sensationally. Also, with most cases, the people who come up with these ideas are then given the mandate to carry it through, so they get to have a certain amount of owner- ship. This guy who had to pass the laugh test has been the chief engineer on every Mars rover that s gone up. There s the nature/nurture question: Do you recruit people with passion or do you build a system that impassions people? As you probably suspect, the answer is yes. They do both.They re very fortunate in that these are people who are working well below the pay level they d get if they ran off to Google or to one of the big video game companies or something. And that does happen with a fair amount of frequency. But the nice thing about [the Jet Propulsion Lab] is you can always go back. One of the things that came up again and again and again when I was interviewing people from NASA, espe- cially from the go-go years when the programs were really running hot and heavy, is, to paraphrase it:This mis- sion isn t going to fail because of me. Does the structure matter or is part of your thesis that you can build all the structure you want but you still need this special sauce? There is truth in both sides of that. The structure does matter. There are a lot of really good books out there that detail that. And NASA uses a lot of those books for guidance; there s a lot of leadership training. Those things are really relevant and good. But I think the critical link is giv- ing people ownership and saying, "OK, I want you to invest yourself in this. I ll back you whatever the outcome, " because innovation is a risky business. Unless you do that, I don t think you re going to have innovation. ■ 'The critical link is giving people ownership' Innovation 16 June 30, 2014 FCW.COM vous techniques. And it does not need to be as daring. Nor would budgets allow it to embrace those things, even if they were bene cial. At the height of the Apollo program, the space program devoured about 5 percent of the national budget. For many years now, it s been more like 0.5 percent. That s a huge difference. And don t think that just because we know more about what we are doing, it has gotten cheaper. Overall, it is a testament to the dedication of the workforce that the agency is able to accomplish what it does. There is one more key element: NASA management. When you speak to the workforce about the manage- ment of the space agency, you will hear opinions across the range from deep admiration to frustration with an aging bureaucracy. But there s one thing most people will agree on: NASA strives to encourage innovation. The techniques vary among eld centers and departments, but one common theme is freedom. Most departments Every time we write about NASA, people say, "That's ne, but it's not fair. They have rockets and astronauts. How can my agency compete with that?"
May 30, 2014
June 15, 2014